Του Θωμά Ακρωτηριανάκη. Μόλις έμαθα ότι πριν από ένα δεκαήμερο περίπου η Χίλλαρυ Κλίντον υποσχέθηκε ότι, αν εκλεγεί πρόεδρος των ΗΠΑ,θ...
Μόλις έμαθα ότι πριν από ένα δεκαήμερο περίπου η Χίλλαρυ Κλίντον υποσχέθηκε ότι,
αν εκλεγεί πρόεδρος των ΗΠΑ,θ' αποκαλύψει τα κρατικά μυστικά για τους Εξωγήινους.
Πάντως,δεν αποκλείω να τηρήσει την υπόσχεσή της αυτή,έως το τέλος της
προεδρικής θητείας της (βλέπω να εκλέγεται,ίσως και για δεύτερη θητεία,μετά το
τέλος της πρώτης)...
Αυτή η ανάρτηση δημοσιεύτηκε το Σάββατο 9 Ιανουαρίου 2016,
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήστις 11.21 μ.μ.,ο δε κωδικός εντοπισμού της (URL) είναι :
http://www.press-gr.com/2016/01/e_9.html
EXOMATHEMATICS
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφή*****************************
ON THE PROBABILITIES OF THE GALAXY'S CIVILISATIONS TO BE MORE THAN ONE,
OR AT LEAST SEVEN
By Thomas Akrotirianakis,
Cydonia (NW Crete,Greece)
Nature has a special relation with number one,a relation of a tendency of surpassing it.I consider that number one,
almost always,is lesser than the number of the qualitatively most extreme
members of an integrated set of Nature (according to a, to any
criterion),and that this is repeated (dialectical negation
of the negation) in the superior integrated sets of Nature,e.g. in our Galaxy,
which is an integrated set of 200 thousand million stars.
Based on the above,I consider that the number of our Galaxy's qualitatively most extreme stars is almost certain to be greater than number one (these,according to the criterion of the grade of the existing around them life,are the having a planet where evolution reached a Homo Sapiens Sapiens level).
What is the probability of the number of the qualitatively most extreme members of an integrated set of Nature to be greater than: (square root 2)x(square root of the natural logarithm,of the number of all its members)?? Because this mathematical expression is of the standardized normal distribution (of its inversion,almost exactly,and z=square root 2 x square root of the natural logarithm of N,where the probability of Z>z is expressed as 1 to N ; this equation is a good enough approximation,with the approximation values being slightly greater,the approximation errors converge to zero,the exact values of z are given by exact calculations,by tables),which is well-known of being of inconceivable great theoretical importance,to which "Nature converges",by which "Nature is ruled"
(all these are shown by the central-limit theorems,that are about how all
distributions converge to the normal distribution,the first was proved in 1901,and
continuously new central-limit theorems are being proved), I guess,by intuition,that Nature and the way she generates her extremities in her integrated sets have an extremely special relation with the above mathematical expression,with the above exact z,and that,thus,the probability of these,especially of the latter,to be lesser than the number of the extremities analogously "deserves" also to be inconceivably great.
I would say that it is,at least,of the order of 50%,which is a
characteristic value.This agrees with the best of my observing abilities too.
So,returning to our Galaxy,and "jumping" by the
dialectical negation of the negation, I guess that the
probability of the number of its civilisation
planet-having stars to be at least seven is,at least,~50%
[seven is the nearest integer to 7.2=(square root 2)x(square root of the
natural logarithm of 200,000,000,000),and to 6.8,which is the value of z,when the probability of Z>z is 1 to 200.000.000.000].
P.S.And by the way,the Galaxy's cross-section
tends to form two normal distribution curves,
which are symmetrical to eachother.
Our Galaxy has ~ 200,000,000,000 stars.
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήThe binary logarithm of 200,000,000,000 is 37.54...
The binary logarithm of the binary logarithm of 200,000,000,000 is 5.23...
So it is probable that there are more than 37 (from the above 37.54...) planets with
humans in our Galaxy.
And it tends to be certain thay there are more than 5 (from the above 5.23...) planets
with humans in our Galaxy.
Humans of different planets differ.
Besides,humans of different continents of the same planet differ.
also see the post :
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήhttp://www.press-gr.com/2016/01/blog-post_5889.html